Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
VISINTAINER NO 09 DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300857 · 1 · EGERIA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1948-08-31 — 324th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: VISINTAINER NO 08 DITCH (1948-08-31). Immediately behind: VISINTAINER NO 10 DITCH (1948-08-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36037.0 | 1948-08-31 | 1956-02-07 | 3.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 358 |
Recorded use (last 13 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 137 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1996, came in at 60 AF — 44% of that, and 4th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 137 | 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median | 59 | 1.5 |
| 1976 | 183 | 10th lowest of 13 · 134% of median | 175 | 1.0 |
| 1977 | 0 | 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1978 | 306 | 13th lowest of 13 · 223% of median | 103 | 1.5 |
| 1979 | 204 | 11th lowest of 13 · 149% of median | 135 | 1.0 |
| 1980 | 255 | 12th lowest of 13 · 186% of median | 153 | 1.5 |
| 1982 | 158 | 9th lowest of 13 · 115% of median | 58 | 1.5 |
| 1990 | 91 | 5th lowest of 13 · 66% of median | 78 | 1.0 |
| 1991 | 143 | 8th lowest of 13 · 104% of median | 142 | 1.0 |
| 1992 | 14 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 10% of median | 71 | 0.1 |
| 1993 | 18 | 3rd lowest of 13 · 13% of median | 90 | 0.1 |
| 1995 | 103 | 6th lowest of 13 · 75% of median | 75 | 0.7 |
| 1996 | 60 | 4th lowest of 13 · 44% of median | 49 | 0.9 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.