Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WILSON AND DOLL DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5300883 · 1 · RED DIRT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1902-07-26 — 156th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOLLY HOMESTEAD NO 1 D (1902-06-25). Immediately behind: C J GUSTAFSON DITCH (1902-09-09).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20427.19199 | 1902-07-26 | 1907-12-09 | 8.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 181 |
| 33023.26662 | 1922-12-31 | 1956-02-07 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 321 |
| 54267.0 | 1998-07-30 | 1998-12-31 | 0.0 | 4.0 | C | IRRCOMDOMSTK | |
| 55020.0 | 2000-08-21 | 1998-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | RECFIS |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,585 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,076 AF — 68% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1,231 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 94 | 13.3 |
| 2009 | 1,585 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 150 | 8.5 |
| 2010 | 1,168 | 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 88 | 8.8 |
| 2011 | 2,730 | 13th lowest of 15 · 172% of median | 189 | 11.6 |
| 2012 | 1,417 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 156 | 6.1 |
| 2013 | 1,993 | 9th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 121 | 10.0 |
| 2014 | 998 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 100 | 6.3 |
| 2015 | 2,767 | 14th lowest of 15 · 175% of median | 170 | 12.4 |
| 2016 | 3,257 | 15th lowest of 15 · 206% of median | 233 | 11.8 |
| 2017 | 2,461 | 11th lowest of 15 · 155% of median | 198 | 7.8 |
| 2018 | 2,135 | 10th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 213 | 5.4 |
| 2019 | 2,589 | 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median | 172 | 9.5 |
| 2020 | 1,416 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 168 | 5.6 |
| 2022 | 301 | 1st lowest of 15 · 19% of median | 20 | 8.0 |
| 2024 | 1,076 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 139 | 4.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.