← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WOHLER GULCH DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5300887 · 1 · EGERIA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-01-01266th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 5305107 (1936-04-01). Immediately behind: EWING WELL (1937-05-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31666.164371895-01-011940-01-29 5.00.0 CIRR 274

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 262 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 231 AF — 88% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 180 2nd lowest of 15 · 69% of median 75 1.5
2007 203 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 25 5.1
2008 369 11th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 52 4.4
2009 262 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 106 1.5
2010 243 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 99 2.0
2011 499 13th lowest of 15 · 190% of median 62 5.2
2012 573 14th lowest of 15 · 219% of median 57 5.4
2013 668 15th lowest of 15 · 255% of median 81 5.2
2015 205 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 46 2.3
2016 354 10th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 64 3.2
2017 290 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 91 2.3
2019 411 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 56 4.2
2022 243 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 41 6.0
2023 127 1st lowest of 15 · 48% of median 32 2.8
2024 231 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 51 2.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3626 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 34% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.