← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FANNING PUMP & PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 5301044 · 8 · SWEETWATER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1966-12-31585th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BACINO PUMP AND PL (1963-08-01). Immediately behind: DELL SPRING (1967-04-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44559.427331966-12-311972-12-31 0.0110.067 CFIRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1991, came in at 32 AF — 582% of that, and 7th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1984 7 5th lowest of 8 · 127% of median 61 0.1
1985 36 8th lowest of 8 · 654% of median 304 0.1
1986 1 1st lowest of 8 · 18% of median 61 0.0
1987 7 5th lowest of 8 · 127% of median 304 0.0
1988 2 2nd lowest of 8 · 36% of median 83 0.0
1989 2 2nd lowest of 8 · 36% of median 82 0.0
1990 4 4th lowest of 8 · 73% of median 170 0.0
1991 32 7th lowest of 8 · 582% of median 161 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1226 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 82% of the irrigation seasons in 1984-1991 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.