← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SLATER FORK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5400568 · 1 · SLATER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-06-014th most senior of the 724 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MORGAN SLATER DITCH (1885-06-01). Immediately behind: MORGAN & BEELER D (1885-06-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12936.01885-06-011894-09-22 6.00.0 CIRR 3

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 521 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 405 AF — 78% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 458 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 47 6.0
2011 1,448 12th lowest of 15 · 278% of median 45 30.0
2012 3,005 15th lowest of 15 · 577% of median 58 35.0
2013 2,038 14th lowest of 15 · 391% of median 107 18.1
2014 1,388 10th lowest of 15 · 266% of median 105 14.0
2015 521 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 82 6.0
2016 508 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 24 12.2
2018 1,408 11th lowest of 15 · 270% of median 71 10.3
2019 1,828 13th lowest of 15 · 351% of median 49 19.2
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 416 5th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 50 4.4
2022 724 9th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 58 7.8
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2024 400 3rd lowest of 15 · 77% of median 14 18.3
2025 405 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 70 6.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.