← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ANDERSON DITCH ALT PT

Structure dossier · WDID 5400589 · 8 · LITTLE SNAKE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:56 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1921-05-31179th most senior of the 724 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ANDERSON DITCH (1921-05-31). Immediately behind: ANDERSON DITCH NO 2 (1921-05-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
41812.260831921-05-311972-05-30 0.00.0 CIRR 3

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 174 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 360 AF — 206% of that, and 11th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 83 5th lowest of 12 · 48% of median 23 2.0
2011 62 4th lowest of 12 · 36% of median 17 3.5
2012 265 8th lowest of 12 · 152% of median 91 1.5
2013 97 6th lowest of 12 · 56% of median 15 3.5
2014 871 12th lowest of 12 · 499% of median 82 6.0
2015 252 7th lowest of 12 · 144% of median 57 3.5
2016 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 312 9th lowest of 12 · 179% of median 65 2.7
2021 351 10th lowest of 12 · 201% of median 64 2.9
2024 360 11th lowest of 12 · 206% of median 67 2.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 485 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 15% of the irrigation seasons in 2009-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.