← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LEE SPRING

Structure dossier · WDID 5600601 · 4 · SPITZIE DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1971-03-01156th most senior of the 909 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEONARD SPRING (1971-03-01). Immediately behind: BASSETT SPG (1973-08-16).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44925.442541971-03-011973-12-31 0.0890.0 CALL

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 65 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1986, came in at 54 AF — 83% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 108 11th lowest of 13 · 166% of median 61 0.9
1975 548 13th lowest of 13 · 843% of median 365 0.9
1976 65 4th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 366 0.1
1977 65 4th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 365 0.1
1978 65 4th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 365 0.1
1979 79 10th lowest of 13 · 122% of median 365 0.2
1980 65 4th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 366 0.1
1981 65 4th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 365 0.1
1982 115 12th lowest of 13 · 177% of median 365 0.9
1983 76 9th lowest of 13 · 117% of median 365 0.2
1984 48 2nd lowest of 13 · 74% of median 305 0.1
1985 40 1st lowest of 13 · 62% of median 244 0.1
1986 54 3rd lowest of 13 · 83% of median 304 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4201 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-1986 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.