← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PINE GROVE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5700578 · 1 · TROUT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-05-0159th most senior of the 1003 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SPRUCE HILL DITCH ALT PT (1894-05-11). Immediately behind: SAGE CREEK RES OUTLET (1897-06-19).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
17071.143661889-05-011897-09-22 1.680.0 CIRRDOM 44
34139.143661889-05-011948-07-12 2.30.0 CIRRDOM 182

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 488 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 385 AF — 79% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 568 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 47 6.2
2012 1,365 15th lowest of 15 · 280% of median 178 5.3
2013 592 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 79 5.7
2014 622 13th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 63 6.4
2015 494 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 48 6.8
2016 252 1st lowest of 15 · 52% of median 41 3.5
2017 431 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 50 5.1
2018 805 14th lowest of 15 · 165% of median 152 6.6
2019 363 2nd lowest of 15 · 74% of median 48 5.6
2020 445 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 67 5.4
2021 436 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 71 6.6
2022 410 4th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 64 5.3
2023 488 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 56 5.8
2024 593 12th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 59 6.1
2025 385 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median 63 6.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.