Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
EAST SIGNS SPRING
Structure dossier · WDID 5700684 · 4 · HOOKER DRAW · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1972-03-20 — 263rd most senior of the 1003 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRENTRESS SPRING 4 (1972-03-01). Immediately behind: WEST SIGNS SPG (1972-03-20).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44639.0 | 1972-03-20 | 1972-12-31 | 0.045 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
W0115-72.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W0115-72 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 173 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1957, came in at 124 AF — 72% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1943 | 257 | 13th lowest of 15 · 149% of median | 138 | 2.2 |
| 1944 | 204 | 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 147 | 2.0 |
| 1945 | 295 | 15th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | 163 | 1.5 |
| 1946 | 133 | 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 87 | 2.0 |
| 1947 | 191 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 105 | 1.3 |
| 1948 | 94 | 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 68 | 1.0 |
| 1949 | 123 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 72 | 1.0 |
| 1950 | 90 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 75 | 1.0 |
| 1951 | 85 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 63 | 1.0 |
| 1952 | 272 | 14th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 144 | 1.0 |
| 1953 | 248 | 12th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 134 | 1.0 |
| 1954 | 63 | 1st lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 55 | 1.0 |
| 1955 | 177 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 104 | 1.0 |
| 1956 | 173 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 103 | 1.0 |
| 1957 | 124 | 6th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 58 | 2.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2489 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 30% of the irrigation seasons in 1919-1957 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.