← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SENECA COALS LIMITED MINE DIVERSION

Structure dossier · WDID 5700815 · 1 · GRASSY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1975-01-06388th most senior of the 1003 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ENERGY POND 1 (1970-01-31). Immediately behind: EAST OF MINE SHOP IMPND (1975-01-06).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46386.456611975-01-061977-12-31 1.10.0 CINDSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 21 11th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 142 0.2
2004 15 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 220 0.1
2005 32 12th lowest of 15 · 246% of median 365 0.1
2006 41 14th lowest of 15 · 315% of median 365 0.2
2007 16 10th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 365 0.0
2008 34 13th lowest of 15 · 262% of median 366 0.1
2009 67 15th lowest of 15 · 515% of median 304 0.3
2010 13 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 200 0.1
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 2 7th lowest of 15 · 15% of median 75 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 5737 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 62% of the irrigation seasons in 1982-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.