← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ASHER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800513 · 1 · ELK RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-05-01215th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH SIDE DITCH (1898-10-23). Immediately behind: OAK DALE DITCH (1894-07-06).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
18449.147311890-05-011900-07-07 2.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFISDOMSTK 93

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,017 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,379 AF — 68% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 25 1st lowest of 15 · 1% of median 12 1.5
2011 369 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median 114 2.0
2012 5,300 14th lowest of 15 · 263% of median 366 15.0
2013 7,205 15th lowest of 15 · 357% of median 304 14.0
2014 2,047 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 123 16.9
2015 3,602 13th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 173 15.0
2016 1,085 3rd lowest of 15 · 54% of median 123 6.3
2017 2,063 11th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 182 10.9
2018 2,017 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 156 11.2
2020 1,420 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 172 8.0
2021 1,980 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 180 6.0
2022 1,749 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 168 8.0
2023 2,241 12th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 183 8.0
2024 2,037 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 197 10.0
2025 1,379 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 304 4.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.