← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

INTERSECTION DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5801316 · 1 · YAMPA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1920-06-011461st most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GRAVES SPRING 7 (1916-07-01). Immediately behind: SOASH SPRING 2 (1925-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47116.257191920-06-011979-12-31 1.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 627 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 907 AF — 145% of that, and 10th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1980 123 5th lowest of 11 · 20% of median 63 1.0
1981 34 2nd lowest of 11 · 5% of median 24 1.0
1982 93 4th lowest of 11 · 15% of median 50 1.0
1983 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 79 3rd lowest of 11 · 13% of median 41 1.0
2020 627 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 160 3.9
2021 652 7th lowest of 11 · 104% of median 163 4.8
2022 837 9th lowest of 11 · 134% of median 219 6.6
2023 1,464 11th lowest of 11 · 234% of median 185 6.3
2024 733 8th lowest of 11 · 117% of median 186 5.9
2025 907 10th lowest of 11 · 145% of median 200 5.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1292 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 13% of the irrigation seasons in 1980-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.