← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

AXTELL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5900513 · 1 · SPRING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1922-09-01630th most senior of the 2360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HILDRETH WELL NO 1 (1931-06-01). Immediately behind: STRINGER DOMESTIC PL (1922-09-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
29771.265411922-09-011932-04-28 1.450.0 CIRR 270

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 368 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 443 AF — 120% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 141 2nd lowest of 15 · 38% of median 157 1.2
2012 320 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 147 1.5
2013 234 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 153 2.3
2014 216 3rd lowest of 15 · 59% of median 98 1.4
2015 352 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 104 1.9
2016 140 1st lowest of 15 · 38% of median 120 1.0
2017 368 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 129 3.1
2018 375 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 185 2.4
2019 387 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 102 3.4
2020 253 5th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 148 1.8
2021 519 13th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 157 3.4
2022 594 14th lowest of 15 · 161% of median 167 4.2
2023 632 15th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 136 3.7
2024 432 11th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 110 2.5
2025 443 12th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 137 2.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.