← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

STOCKDALE BENNETT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6000768 · 1 · NATURITA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1898-04-01806th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BREWERY PIPELINE (1897-06-15). Immediately behind: BOWLING DITCH (1898-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30604.176231898-04-011939-11-01 3.00.0 CIRR 235

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 99 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 9 AF — 9% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 99 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 68 1.6
2011 161 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 92 2.0
2012 133 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 71 1.8
2013 76 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 123 0.6
2014 202 14th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 78 3.0
2015 99 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 70 1.2
2016 168 13th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 116 2.0
2017 139 11th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 86 1.4
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2019 225 15th lowest of 15 · 227% of median 105 2.0
2020 21 5th lowest of 15 · 21% of median 58 0.3
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2023 131 9th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 97 2.3
2024 9 4th lowest of 15 · 9% of median 36 0.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.