Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

JACOBS SEEP & WASTE D

Structure dossier · WDID 6000820 · 1 · NATURITA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1920-06-01 — 1344th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MEADOW SPRING PIPELINE (1975-09-01). Immediately behind: CAMPBELL SPRING PIPELINE (1900-04-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46019.257191920-06-011976-12-30 2.50.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 44 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 104 AF — 236% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 42 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 158 0.2
1988 62 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 108 0.5
1989 65 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 165 0.2
1990 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
1991 18 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 72 0.2
1992 40 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 138 0.2
1993 156 14th lowest of 15 · 354% of median 184 1.0
1994 88 12th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 175 0.5
1995 204 15th lowest of 15 · 464% of median 170 1.0
1996 25 3rd lowest of 15 · 57% of median 90 0.2
1997 58 9th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 165 0.3
1998 44 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 130 0.3
1999 44 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 139 0.2
2000 36 4th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 75 0.2
2001 104 13th lowest of 15 · 236% of median 124 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.