Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OLIVER TILE LINE

Structure dossier · WDID 6001073 · 7 · MAVERICK DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:41 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1956-08-01 — 1059th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOMEWOOD SPG & PL NO 16A (1950-08-15). Immediately behind: MIRAMONTE COLL DITCH NO1 (1969-09-03).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44194.389291956-08-011971-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 58 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 63 AF — 109% of that, and 9th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 58 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 199 0.2
1988 41 1st lowest of 13 · 71% of median 108 0.2
1989 61 8th lowest of 13 · 105% of median 212 0.2
1990 41 1st lowest of 13 · 71% of median 209 0.1
1991 52 5th lowest of 13 · 90% of median 157 0.2
1992 51 4th lowest of 13 · 88% of median 191 0.2
1993 95 11th lowest of 13 · 164% of median 200 0.3
1994 63 9th lowest of 13 · 109% of median 176 0.3
1995 102 12th lowest of 13 · 176% of median 187 0.3
1996 50 3rd lowest of 13 · 86% of median 181 0.2
1997 53 6th lowest of 13 · 91% of median 192 0.2
1998 120 13th lowest of 13 · 207% of median 304 0.2
1999 63 9th lowest of 13 · 109% of median 159 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2475 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 92% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-1999 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.