← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

UPHAM RESERVOIR FILL D

Structure dossier · WDID 6201621 · 1 · LAKE FORK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 19:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1991-05-301278th most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WATSON SPRING NO 1 (1991-05-13). Immediately behind: DEMING SPRING NO. 2 (1991-12-13).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
51649.01991-05-301991-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRRECFISDOMWLD

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 318 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 119 AF — 37% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 404 14th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 148 2.2
2011 326 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 152 1.9
2012 340 11th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 185 1.4
2013 376 13th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 138 1.6
2014 357 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 155 1.6
2015 200 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median 76 1.6
2017 329 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 149 1.4
2018 157 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 117 1.2
2019 204 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 156 1.1
2020 222 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 134 1.1
2021 217 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 167 1.4
2022 237 7th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 139 1.1
2023 318 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 147 1.8
2024 488 15th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 184 1.7
2025 119 1st lowest of 15 · 37% of median 80 1.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.