Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NEW BAKER EAST SIDE D
Structure dossier · WDID 6201660 · 1 · LAKE FORK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-09-01 — 222nd most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILSON INFILT GALLERY SY (1921-04-01). Immediately behind: UPPER FISH POND DITCH (1882-09-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27585.11932 | 1882-09-01 | 1941-04-21 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | STOFIS | |
| 52960.41272 | 1962-12-31 | 1995-12-31 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | STOFIS |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,433 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 398 AF — 28% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1,516 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 170 | 6.8 |
| 2010 | 1,601 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 173 | 6.0 |
| 2011 | 1,380 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 168 | 6.5 |
| 2012 | 1,966 | 14th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 178 | 6.4 |
| 2013 | 1,932 | 13th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 175 | 6.2 |
| 2014 | 1,347 | 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 172 | 5.6 |
| 2015 | 1,198 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 134 | 5.3 |
| 2017 | 1,119 | 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 149 | 6.4 |
| 2018 | 1,433 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 164 | 6.1 |
| 2019 | 1,026 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 150 | 5.5 |
| 2020 | 680 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 127 | 5.5 |
| 2022 | 1,650 | 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 169 | 6.0 |
| 2023 | 1,638 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 147 | 6.9 |
| 2024 | 1,966 | 14th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 184 | 6.6 |
| 2025 | 398 | 1st lowest of 15 · 28% of median | 81 | 4.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.