Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BARTHOLOMEW AND HATCH D

Structure dossier · WDID 6300501 · 1 · WEST CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1900-02-01 — 195th most senior of the 533 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WINES DITCH NO 2 (1899-11-01). Immediately behind: CLIFF RANCH DITCH (1900-02-01).

Decreed rights (7)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30079.182941900-02-011939-02-11 5.050.0 CIRRDOM 36, 37
30079.183831900-05-011939-02-11 0.00.0 CIRR 38
30079.191581902-06-151939-02-11 0.00.0 CIRR 42
30079.221881910-10-011939-02-11 0.00.0 CIRRDOM 62, 63
30079.250021918-06-151939-02-11 0.00.0 CIRR 83, 84
30079.265811922-10-111939-02-11 0.00.0 CIRR 87
32547.01939-02-101939-02-11 4.250.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 794 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 488 AF — 62% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,839 15th lowest of 15 · 232% of median 208 6.9
2012 582 3rd lowest of 15 · 73% of median 179 4.7
2013 329 1st lowest of 15 · 41% of median 133 2.7
2014 843 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 186 5.1
2015 617 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 159 4.3
2016 674 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 186 5.2
2017 1,290 14th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 256 4.7
2018 622 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 252 2.7
2019 824 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 181 4.5
2020 1,065 13th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 302 4.6
2021 1,005 12th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 335 4.9
2022 854 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 254 4.6
2023 794 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 205 4.4
2024 766 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 192 6.0
2025 488 2nd lowest of 15 · 62% of median 204 2.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.