← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOWLINE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6400524 · 1 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-10-14 — 35th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KAUFMAN WELL 3-1898 (1882-06-22). Immediately behind: SOUTH PLATTE RIVER (1882-10-14).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11975.0 | 1882-10-14 | 1894-11-15 | 39.761 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 55882.55786 | 2002-09-26 | 2003-12-31 | 40.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFIRSTKAUGRCHWLD | |
| 55940.0 | 2003-02-27 | 2003-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFIRSTKAUGRCH |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 9,153 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 10,237 AF — 112% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 9,153 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 277 | 39.7 |
| 2011 | 9,022 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | — | 253 | 46.0 |
| 2012 | 10,527 | 12th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | — | 253 | 39.6 |
| 2013 | 8,840 | 5th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 207 | 41.5 |
| 2014 | 7,285 | 1st lowest of 15 · 80% of median | — | 192 | 43.7 |
| 2015 | 7,815 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 85% of median | — | 203 | 39.6 |
| 2016 | 10,374 | 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | — | 262 | 36.8 |
| 2017 | 11,615 | 13th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | — | 261 | 37.3 |
| 2018 | 9,907 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | — | 236 | 56.6 |
| 2019 | 8,534 | 4th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | — | 209 | 39.8 |
| 2020 | 8,941 | 6th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | — | 231 | 36.9 |
| 2021 | 18,227 | 15th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | — | 248 | 70.6 |
| 2022 | 11,847 | 14th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | — | 244 | 41.4 |
| 2023 | 8,045 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 88% of median | — | 217 | 40.3 |
| 2024 | 10,237 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 241 | 42.7 |
Call-derived yield: senior right divertible 46.8% of a median season / 6.5% dry-year.
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.