← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GRANT WELL 5-15519-F

Structure dossier · WDID 6405575 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1971-04-081414th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUFFALO HILLS WELL 1-44040 (1971-03-31). Immediately behind: HETTINGER DOM WELL 45802 (1971-05-18).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44292.01971-04-081971-12-31 3.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 132 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 186 AF — 141% of that, and 9th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 180 8th lowest of 13 · 136% of median 125 1.3
2013 283 11th lowest of 13 · 214% of median 92 2.2
2014 70 2nd lowest of 13 · 53% of median 50 1.0
2015 82 3rd lowest of 13 · 62% of median 56 1.0
2016 104 5th lowest of 13 · 79% of median 45 1.3
2017 132 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 59 1.7
2018 95 4th lowest of 13 · 72% of median 44 2.0
2019 31 1st lowest of 13 · 24% of median 22 0.8
2020 193 10th lowest of 13 · 146% of median 61 2.6
2021 118 6th lowest of 13 · 89% of median 45 2.1
2022 291 12th lowest of 13 · 220% of median 99 1.9
2023 316 13th lowest of 13 · 239% of median 111 1.5
2024 186 9th lowest of 13 · 141% of median 71 1.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 880 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 33% of the irrigation seasons in 2012-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.