Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SONNENBERG WELL 47-6683F
Structure dossier · WDID 6406330 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1965-04-01 — 1231st most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SONNENBERG WELL 46-6832F (1965-04-01). Immediately behind: SONNENBERG WELL 48-6684F (1965-04-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42094.0 | 1965-04-01 | 1972-12-31 | 5.55 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 55882.55878 | 2002-12-27 | 2003-12-31 | 1524.8 | 475.2 | A | IRRMUNCOMFIRSTKAUGRCHWLD | |
| 55882.55878 | 2002-12-27 | 2003-12-31 | 6.67 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMFIRSTKAUGRCHWLD |
Legal record & documents
5 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
17CW3208, 11CW0012, 03CW0208, W2289.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
17CW3208 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
11CW0012 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
03CW0208 | 2 | 2003-12-31 | S |
W2289 | 1 | 1972-12-31 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,057 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 743 AF — 70% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2,152 | 15th lowest of 15 · 204% of median | 152 | 11.5 |
| 2011 | 1,136 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 225 | 9.5 |
| 2012 | 691 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 65% of median | 74 | 7.0 |
| 2013 | 406 | 1st lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 54 | 4.6 |
| 2014 | 1,057 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 122 | 6.1 |
| 2015 | 1,395 | 14th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 139 | 5.7 |
| 2016 | 1,147 | 12th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 134 | 5.1 |
| 2017 | 877 | 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 95 | 5.3 |
| 2018 | 824 | 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 121 | 4.8 |
| 2019 | 1,178 | 13th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 123 | 5.3 |
| 2020 | 1,083 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 132 | 6.9 |
| 2021 | 1,100 | 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 176 | 5.1 |
| 2022 | 732 | 4th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 108 | 5.6 |
| 2023 | 697 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 111 | 4.7 |
| 2024 | 743 | 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 122 | 5.1 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1901 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 51% of the irrigation seasons in 2006-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.