Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
STROMBERGER E RCHRG W 5-58704-F
Structure dossier · WDID 6406655 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 2002-11-22 — 1799th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STROMBERGER E RCHRG W 4-58703-F (2002-11-22). Immediately behind: STROMBERGER E RCHRG W 6-58705-F (2002-11-22).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55882.55843 | 2002-11-22 | 2003-12-31 | 2035.7 | 964.3 | A | IRRMUNCOMFIRSTKAUGRCHWLD | |
| 55882.55843 | 2002-11-22 | 2003-12-31 | 8.88 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMFIRSTKAUGRCHWLD |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
17CW3208, 11CW0012, 03CW0208.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
17CW3208 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
11CW0012 | 1 | 2003-12-31 | S |
03CW0208 | 2 | 2003-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,663 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,677 AF — 101% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 317 | 1st lowest of 15 · 19% of median | 22 | 8.3 |
| 2011 | 1,723 | 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 132 | 9.2 |
| 2012 | 1,663 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 127 | 14.1 |
| 2013 | 1,564 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 117 | 8.6 |
| 2014 | 1,454 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 121 | 7.6 |
| 2015 | 2,223 | 14th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 161 | 7.7 |
| 2016 | 1,807 | 12th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 133 | 7.6 |
| 2017 | 1,364 | 4th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 98 | 7.3 |
| 2018 | 1,393 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 106 | 7.1 |
| 2019 | 1,986 | 13th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 158 | 6.9 |
| 2020 | 1,723 | 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 132 | 7.2 |
| 2021 | 1,354 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 135 | 6.8 |
| 2022 | 1,305 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 102 | 7.1 |
| 2023 | 3,758 | 15th lowest of 15 · 226% of median | 332 | 6.6 |
| 2024 | 1,677 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 137 | 7.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2117 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 57% of the irrigation seasons in 2006-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.