← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DINSDALE BROS AUG WL 5-59853-F

Structure dossier · WDID 6406704 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2003-03-261828th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DINSDALE FEEDLOT W 3-64888 (2003-03-26). Immediately behind: SPRINGDALE D CO AUG W 59322-F (2003-03-28).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
55967.02003-03-262003-12-31 658.01342.0 AAUG
55967.02003-03-262003-12-31 4.5631.007 CAUG

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 346 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 232 AF — 67% of that, and 5th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 no recorded volume 468 0
2012 595 11th lowest of 13 · 172% of median 595 108 4.4
2013 659 12th lowest of 13 · 190% of median 659 109 3.3
2014 16 1st lowest of 13 · 5% of median 16 5 2.1
2015 19 2nd lowest of 13 · 6% of median 22 6 1.9
2016 286 6th lowest of 13 · 83% of median 84 48 4.0
2017 356 8th lowest of 13 · 103% of median 356 74 4.2
2018 371 9th lowest of 13 · 107% of median 371 76 3.1
2019 55 3rd lowest of 13 · 16% of median 55 10 3.6
2020 453 10th lowest of 13 · 131% of median 85 104 2.7
2021 346 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 346 59 3.3
2022 745 13th lowest of 13 · 215% of median 745 126 3.4
2023 160 4th lowest of 13 · 46% of median 413 27 3.6
2024 232 5th lowest of 13 · 67% of median 232 43 4.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.