← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROSWELL HOTCHKISS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6800720 · 1 · UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1881-09-15 — 65th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: UPPER UNCOMPAHGRE DITCH (1881-09-10). Immediately behind: BROWN DITCH (1881-10-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11581.0 | 1881-09-15 | 1897-05-15 | 3.75 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 51 |
| 12498.0 | 1884-03-20 | 1897-05-15 | 1.625 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 29554.1254 | 1884-05-01 | 1942-05-11 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 33 |
| 55517.51255 | 1990-05-01 | 2002-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 60630.11581 | 1881-09-15 | 2016-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | STK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,708 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,829 AF — 107% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,274 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 75% of median | — | 276 | 8.0 |
| 2012 | 1,216 | 1st lowest of 15 · 71% of median | — | 233 | 6.1 |
| 2013 | 1,485 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 5 | 365 | 6.5 |
| 2014 | 1,430 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | — | 365 | 5.7 |
| 2015 | 1,232 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 72% of median | — | 365 | 4.5 |
| 2016 | 1,354 | 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | — | 366 | 4.6 |
| 2017 | 1,907 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 365 | 8.8 |
| 2018 | 2,591 | 15th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | — | 351 | 15.8 |
| 2019 | 1,708 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 305 | 6.7 |
| 2020 | 1,534 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | — | 290 | 5.4 |
| 2021 | 1,788 | 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | 2 | 365 | 5.5 |
| 2022 | 2,080 | 13th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | — | 319 | 7.0 |
| 2023 | 1,920 | 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 273 | 6.3 |
| 2024 | 2,209 | 14th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | — | 366 | 6.7 |
| 2025 | 1,829 | 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | — | 304 | 6.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.