← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HENRY M KNIGHT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6900508 · 1 · DISAPPOINTMENT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-03-011st most senior of the 55 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately behind: CLARK DITCH (1883-06-21).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
15372.121131883-03-011911-03-28 1.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 53 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 37 AF — 70% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1990 155 12th lowest of 15 · 292% of median 104 1.5
1991 39 7th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 14 3.8
1992 544 15th lowest of 15 · 1026% of median 142 3.0
1993 167 13th lowest of 15 · 315% of median 62 2.0
1994 184 14th lowest of 15 · 347% of median 79 2.0
1995 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 8 0.0
1996 53 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 22 2.0
1997 128 11th lowest of 15 · 242% of median 33 2.8
1998 98 10th lowest of 15 · 185% of median 37 2.3
1999 57 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 27 1.5
2000 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2001 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2002 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2003 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2006 37 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 41 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2409 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 20% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2006 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.