← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DORA DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6900532 · 1 · DISAPPOINTMENT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1982-08-11 — 36th most senior of the 55 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILDCAT SPRING (1981-08-18). Immediately behind: EDYTHELMA SPRING (1982-08-11).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48435.0 | 1982-08-11 | 1982-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 10 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 92 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2004, came in at 95 AF — 103% of that, and 7th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 186 | 9th lowest of 10 · 202% of median | 64 | 2.0 |
| 1995 | 306 | 10th lowest of 10 · 333% of median | 117 | 2.7 |
| 1996 | 0 | 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1997 | 89 | 4th lowest of 10 · 97% of median | 46 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 91 | 5th lowest of 10 · 99% of median | 48 | 1.0 |
| 1999 | 166 | 8th lowest of 10 · 180% of median | 62 | 1.5 |
| 2000 | 24 | 3rd lowest of 10 · 26% of median | 16 | 1.2 |
| 2001 | 93 | 6th lowest of 10 · 101% of median | 64 | 1.0 |
| 2002 | 0 | 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median | 5 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | 95 | 7th lowest of 10 · 103% of median | 49 | 1.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.