← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DORA DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6900532 · 1 · DISAPPOINTMENT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1982-08-1136th most senior of the 55 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILDCAT SPRING (1981-08-18). Immediately behind: EDYTHELMA SPRING (1982-08-11).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
48435.01982-08-111982-12-31 2.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 92 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2004, came in at 95 AF — 103% of that, and 7th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 186 9th lowest of 10 · 202% of median 64 2.0
1995 306 10th lowest of 10 · 333% of median 117 2.7
1996 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 2 0.0
1997 89 4th lowest of 10 · 97% of median 46 1.0
1998 91 5th lowest of 10 · 99% of median 48 1.0
1999 166 8th lowest of 10 · 180% of median 62 1.5
2000 24 3rd lowest of 10 · 26% of median 16 1.2
2001 93 6th lowest of 10 · 101% of median 64 1.0
2002 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2004 95 7th lowest of 10 · 103% of median 49 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.