← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CISSNA DITCH NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 7000518 · 1 · CONN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:53 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1910-05-01 — 64th most senior of the 519 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NEW HOBO DITCH (1908-06-06). Immediately behind: CISSNA DITCH NO 2 (1910-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23324.22035 | 1910-05-01 | 1914-07-13 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 154BBB |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 141 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 86 AF — 61% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 365 | 13th lowest of 15 · 259% of median | 77 | 3.5 |
| 1985 | 226 | 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 66 | 3.8 |
| 1986 | 458 | 15th lowest of 15 · 325% of median | 82 | 7.0 |
| 1987 | 164 | 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 53 | 2.8 |
| 1989 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1993 | 337 | 12th lowest of 15 · 239% of median | 81 | 4.0 |
| 1994 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1995 | 418 | 14th lowest of 15 · 296% of median | 86 | 4.0 |
| 1997 | 118 | 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 88 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 141 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 86 | 1.0 |
| 1999 | 17 | 4th lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 13 | 1.0 |
| 2005 | 255 | 11th lowest of 15 · 181% of median | 90 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 20 | 5th lowest of 15 · 14% of median | 37 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 86 | 6th lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 36 | 1.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.