← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

H A NEWTON DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7000548 · 1 · CLEAR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1907-05-1572nd most senior of the 519 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SMITH DITCH (1912-08-21). Immediately behind: PARKES DITCH (1908-05-05).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
24183.209531907-05-151916-11-25 0.80.0 CIRR 153AAB
27132.270591924-02-011937-01-11 2.060.0 CIRR 181FF

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1990, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1972 63 6th lowest of 10 · 170% of median 11 4.0
1973 430 10th lowest of 10 · 1162% of median 101 5.0
1974 256 9th lowest of 10 · 692% of median 54 3.0
1975 164 8th lowest of 10 · 443% of median 29 3.1
1979 139 7th lowest of 10 · 376% of median 99 1.3
1980 11 5th lowest of 10 · 30% of median 12 0.5
1987 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1988 3 4th lowest of 10 · 8% of median 2 1.5
1989 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 2 0.0
1990 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 312 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 8% of the irrigation seasons in 1972-1990 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.