← My Water · Print / save as PDF
H V C AND S DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7000550 · 1 · ROAN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-10-28 — 47th most senior of the 519 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BRIDGES-HAYES DITCH (1887-05-10). Immediately behind: CALDWELL DITCH (1890-05-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14911.0 | 1890-10-28 | 1900-02-20 | 9.7 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 147AA |
| 16162.0 | 1894-04-01 | 1900-02-20 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 152B |
| 24792.22102 | 1910-07-07 | 1917-12-17 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 154BBC |
| 57978.0 | 2008-09-26 | 2008-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | RECFISAUGWLD | |
| 57978.0 | 2008-09-26 | 2008-12-31 | 0.0 | 1.0 | C | RECFISAUGWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,651 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 648 AF — 39% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3,417 | 15th lowest of 15 · 207% of median | 109 | 23.9 |
| 2012 | 1,903 | 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 130 | 9.5 |
| 2013 | 156 | 1st lowest of 15 · 9% of median | 50 | 3.5 |
| 2014 | 997 | 6th lowest of 15 · 60% of median | 80 | 8.8 |
| 2015 | 2,055 | 11th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 173 | 9.9 |
| 2016 | 2,475 | 12th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 134 | 16.0 |
| 2017 | 2,851 | 13th lowest of 15 · 173% of median | 164 | 18.2 |
| 2018 | 622 | 4th lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 103 | 7.0 |
| 2019 | 3,388 | 14th lowest of 15 · 205% of median | 183 | 16.0 |
| 2020 | 584 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 35% of median | 46 | 8.9 |
| 2021 | 274 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 17% of median | 41 | 4.7 |
| 2022 | 1,314 | 7th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 95 | 10.0 |
| 2023 | 1,651 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 145 | 8.5 |
| 2024 | 1,842 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 114 | 10.4 |
| 2025 | 648 | 5th lowest of 15 · 39% of median | 121 | 7.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.