Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOVELESS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7000565 · 1 · DRY FORK ROAN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-05-15 — 43rd most senior of the 519 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CARR & HIMEBAUGH ALT PT (1887-04-22). Immediately behind: ARMSTRONG DITCH (1888-04-25).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13649.0 | 1887-05-15 | 1889-05-11 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 113 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 213 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2013, came in at 8 AF — 4% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 111 | 7th lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 30 | 2.9 |
| 1987 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1993 | 246 | 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 52 | 3.0 |
| 1994 | 3 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 1% of median | 23 | 0.7 |
| 1995 | 359 | 10th lowest of 15 · 168% of median | 79 | 3.4 |
| 1996 | 213 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 89 | 1.7 |
| 1997 | 539 | 14th lowest of 15 · 253% of median | 94 | 5.2 |
| 1998 | 365 | 12th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 104 | 2.5 |
| 1999 | 540 | 15th lowest of 15 · 254% of median | 162 | 2.5 |
| 2000 | 103 | 6th lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 56 | 1.5 |
| 2005 | 493 | 13th lowest of 15 · 232% of median | 205 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | 28 | 5th lowest of 15 · 13% of median | 29 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 17 | 4th lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 63 | 0.2 |
| 2011 | 364 | 11th lowest of 15 · 171% of median | 86 | 3.4 |
| 2013 | 8 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 4% of median | 32 | 0.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.