← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LINDSTROM DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7100563 · 1 · DOLORES RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1894-12-3149th most senior of the 279 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KIPPER DITCH NO 3 (1894-06-01). Immediately behind: KNOBLOCK DITCH (1896-03-21).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16436.01894-12-311933-12-18 4.50.0 CIRR D-37

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 222 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 278 AF — 125% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 298 12th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 76 3.2
2012 272 10th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 76 4.5
2013 222 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 53 3.5
2014 238 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 55 3.5
2015 54 3rd lowest of 15 · 24% of median 31 1.4
2016 60 4th lowest of 15 · 27% of median 29 1.6
2017 113 6th lowest of 15 · 51% of median 57 1.9
2018 200 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 81 6.2
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2020 446 14th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 131 4.3
2021 767 15th lowest of 15 · 346% of median 101 6.1
2022 413 13th lowest of 15 · 186% of median 101 4.8
2023 73 5th lowest of 15 · 33% of median 67 1.2
2024 19 2nd lowest of 15 · 9% of median 43 0.3
2025 278 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 130 4.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 4826 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 30% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.