← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SUMMIT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7100609 · 1 · LOST CANYON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1913-06-1482nd most senior of the 279 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SELLARS & MCCLANE SUP D (1906-04-18). Immediately behind: AKIN WELL (1934-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30667.231751913-06-141963-03-22 135.00.0 CIRRDOM 62-51

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 5,638 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,277 AF — 58% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 6,931 14th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 204 68.3
2012 5,240 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 108 80.1
2013 3,630 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 266 68.4
2014 5,896 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 249 79.1
2015 6,883 13th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 339 79.7
2016 7,074 15th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 353 81.2
2017 5,638 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 346 44.5
2018 1,231 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median 196 28.3
2019 5,785 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 155 70.9
2020 3,231 3rd lowest of 15 · 57% of median 165 87.9
2021 2,457 2nd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 297 52.4
2022 6,226 12th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 365 82.0
2023 6,092 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 365 67.0
2024 4,093 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 366 78.6
2025 3,277 4th lowest of 15 · 58% of median 304 65.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.