Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NEW ERIE CANAL
Structure dossier · WDID 7200616 · 1 · PLATEAU CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1906-06-01 — 228th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ERIE CANAL (1906-06-01). Immediately behind: OWENS CREEK DITCH (1907-06-07).
Decreed rights (7)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22995.20605 | 1906-06-01 | 1916-06-01 | 4.09 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 284 |
| 22995.22197 | 1910-10-10 | 1916-06-01 | 4.95 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 321 |
| 30895.23583 | 1914-07-27 | 1941-07-25 | 0.45 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 392 |
| 30895.24601 | 1917-05-10 | 1941-07-25 | 0.81 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 491 |
| 30895.24957 | 1918-05-01 | 1941-07-25 | 1.04 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 503 |
| 32811.0 | 1939-11-01 | 1941-07-25 | 4.52 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 610 |
| 36746.0 | 1950-08-10 | 1959-07-21 | 20.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
7 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA8303, CA9529, CA2635.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA8303 | 1 | 1959-07-21 | S |
CA9529 | 5 | 1941-07-25 | S |
CA2635 | 1 | 1916-06-01 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,055 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 926 AF — 88% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1,380 | 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 69 | 19.0 |
| 2011 | 1,539 | 13th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 55 | 19.2 |
| 2012 | 1,880 | 14th lowest of 15 · 178% of median | 109 | 16.8 |
| 2013 | 378 | 1st lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 54 | 11.4 |
| 2014 | 1,055 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 65 | 20.8 |
| 2015 | 766 | 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 48 | 20.1 |
| 2016 | 1,233 | 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 66 | 25.5 |
| 2017 | 609 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 54 | 15.6 |
| 2018 | 804 | 5th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 101 | 16.6 |
| 2019 | 2,289 | 15th lowest of 15 · 217% of median | 128 | 36.9 |
| 2020 | 1,114 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 76 | 23.0 |
| 2021 | 1,025 | 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 51 | 17.0 |
| 2022 | 691 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 60 | 9.5 |
| 2023 | 1,387 | 12th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 143 | 13.1 |
| 2024 | 926 | 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 95 | 18.1 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 7 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 4465 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 38% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.