Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HOLLINGSWORTH DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200701 · 1 · SPRING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1882-12-01 — 100th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WASSON WELL NO 2 (1900-12-31). Immediately behind: HOOSIER DITCH (1888-10-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
18749.120231882-12-011905-10-14 0.360.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 136 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 128 AF — 94% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1992 148 11th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 169 0.5
1993 155 13th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 168 0.5
1994 141 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 143 0.5
1995 156 14th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 158 0.5
1996 153 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 151 1.0
1997 196 15th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 171 1.0
1998 125 2nd lowest of 15 · 92% of median 176 0.4
1999 138 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 194 0.4
2000 136 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 191 0.4
2001 108 1st lowest of 15 · 79% of median 152 0.4
2002 129 5th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 181 0.4
2003 130 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 183 0.4
2004 125 2nd lowest of 15 · 92% of median 176 0.4
2005 132 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 186 0.4
2006 128 4th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 180 0.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 5502 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 70% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2006 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.