← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MARTIN CRAWFORD DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200764 · 1 · RAPID CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1929-06-28 — 470th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: VAN DEN HEUVEL DITCH (1929-05-05). Immediately behind: REEDER W W DITCH HGT NO1 (1930-05-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30895.29033 | 1929-06-28 | 1941-07-25 | 2.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | |
| 34419.33723 | 1942-05-01 | 1959-07-21 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 48942.48333 | 1982-05-01 | 1984-12-31 | 8.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOM |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 67 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 89 | 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 117 | 0.7 |
| 2006 | 240 | 13th lowest of 15 · 358% of median | 96 | 6.0 |
| 2007 | 400 | 15th lowest of 15 · 597% of median | 235 | 4.4 |
| 2008 | 54 | 7th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 96 | 0.7 |
| 2009 | 67 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 199 | 0.2 |
| 2010 | 20 | 5th lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 16 | 0.7 |
| 2011 | 194 | 12th lowest of 15 · 290% of median | 150 | 0.7 |
| 2012 | 43 | 6th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 35 | 0.7 |
| 2013 | 80 | 9th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 62 | 0.7 |
| 2015 | 296 | 14th lowest of 15 · 442% of median | 136 | 1.5 |
| 2016 | 85 | 10th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 66 | 0.7 |
| 2019 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 15% of median | 39 | 0.7 |
| 2020 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 15% of median | 21 | 0.4 |
| 2022 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 15% of median | 57 | 0.2 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.