← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RED MOUNTAIN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200846 · 1 · GROVE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1909-08-15241st most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MCKINNEY DITCH (1909-07-23). Immediately behind: TEAGUE DITCH (1910-01-12).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
22995.217761909-08-151916-06-01 1.2960.0 CIRR
30895.245761917-04-151941-07-25 2.3040.0 CIRR
32811.01939-11-011941-07-25 0.7690.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 434 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 330 AF — 76% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 403 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 86 3.2
2011 568 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 123 3.3
2012 393 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 114 2.8
2013 434 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 111 4.6
2014 810 13th lowest of 15 · 187% of median 150 5.9
2015 558 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median 200 2.7
2016 873 14th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 194 4.3
2017 508 9th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 144 3.0
2018 159 3rd lowest of 15 · 37% of median 95 2.2
2019 1,045 15th lowest of 15 · 241% of median 164 5.7
2020 191 4th lowest of 15 · 44% of median 71 4.4
2021 133 2nd lowest of 15 · 31% of median 62 2.2
2022 121 1st lowest of 15 · 28% of median 74 1.4
2023 644 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 142 3.4
2024 330 5th lowest of 15 · 76% of median 100 3.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.