Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
UHL CREEK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200915 · 1 · MIDDLETON CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 05:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1907-10-21 — 231st most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CO-OPERATIVE DITCH (1907-10-21). Immediately behind: ATWELL WASTE SEEP DITCH (1908-05-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22995.21112 | 1907-10-21 | 1916-06-01 | 2.43 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 22995.21345 | 1908-06-10 | 1916-06-01 | 3.276 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 30895.24241 | 1916-05-15 | 1941-07-25 | 0.9 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 30895.24602 | 1917-05-11 | 1941-07-25 | 1.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
8 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA5812, CA2635, CA10286.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA5812 | 2 | 1941-07-25 | S |
CA2635 | 3 | 1916-06-01 | S |
CA10286 | 3 | 1916-06-01 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 312 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 318 AF — 102% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 427 | 13th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 52 | 5.5 |
| 2010 | 365 | 11th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 72 | 4.2 |
| 2011 | 371 | 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median | 71 | 4.0 |
| 2012 | 154 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 77 | 1.8 |
| 2013 | 196 | 4th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 38 | 3.8 |
| 2014 | 318 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 61 | 4.0 |
| 2015 | 526 | 14th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 70 | 5.2 |
| 2016 | 261 | 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 41 | 4.2 |
| 2017 | 312 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 43 | 4.4 |
| 2018 | 252 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 40 | 4.2 |
| 2019 | 571 | 15th lowest of 15 · 183% of median | 87 | 4.5 |
| 2020 | 105 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 18 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 99 | 1st lowest of 15 · 32% of median | 26 | 2.0 |
| 2023 | 213 | 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 56 | 3.0 |
| 2024 | 318 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 60 | 3.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 4 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2587 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 22% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.