← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

VAN DEN HEUVEL NO 2 D

Structure dossier · WDID 7200927 · 1 · OWENS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1935-06-15492nd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORMAN F HILL DITCH C (1935-05-17). Immediately behind: BULL BASIN NO 2 RES (1935-10-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31211.01935-06-151941-07-25 1.30.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 58 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 54 AF — 94% of that, and 6th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1998 88 11th lowest of 14 · 153% of median 35 1.3
2001 70 9th lowest of 14 · 122% of median 28 1.3
2004 18 2nd lowest of 14 · 31% of median 8 1.3
2005 60 8th lowest of 14 · 104% of median 42 1.0
2006 32 4th lowest of 14 · 56% of median 23 1.0
2007 111 12th lowest of 14 · 193% of median 44 1.3
2008 83 10th lowest of 14 · 144% of median 33 1.3
2009 39 5th lowest of 14 · 68% of median 16 1.3
2010 137 14th lowest of 14 · 238% of median 54 1.3
2014 118 13th lowest of 14 · 205% of median 41 2.0
2015 55 7th lowest of 14 · 96% of median 31 1.3
2016 21 3rd lowest of 14 · 36% of median 8 1.5
2024 54 6th lowest of 14 · 94% of median 22 1.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 386 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 6% of the irrigation seasons in 1996-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.