← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HILL DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200956 · 1 · BUZZARD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1897-05-01 — 747th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PREWETT WELL (1959-07-20). Immediately behind: CHAPMAN DITCH NO 1 (1900-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40013.17288 | 1897-05-01 | 1972-04-13 | 1.15 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 954 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 302 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 55 AF — 18% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 220 | 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 128 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | 407 | 14th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 164 | 1.5 |
| 2009 | 466 | 15th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 171 | 1.5 |
| 2010 | 290 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 128 | 1.1 |
| 2011 | 357 | 13th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 138 | 1.5 |
| 2012 | 352 | 11th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 140 | 1.5 |
| 2013 | 311 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 142 | 2.7 |
| 2014 | 356 | 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 141 | 1.5 |
| 2015 | 52 | 1st lowest of 15 · 17% of median | 40 | 0.8 |
| 2016 | 309 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 135 | 2.4 |
| 2017 | 302 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 194 | 1.1 |
| 2018 | 219 | 5th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 136 | 1.2 |
| 2019 | 161 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median | 112 | 1.2 |
| 2020 | 210 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 114 | 1.2 |
| 2021 | 55 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 62 | 0.9 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.