Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ZEIGEL STOCK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7201254 · 1 · PLATEAU CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1956-07-05 — 781st most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JERRY CREEK RES NO 2 (1956-05-11). Immediately behind: UPPER HIGHT DITCH (1956-08-26).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
40013.389021956-07-051972-04-13 0.20.0 CDOMSTK 1014

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 38 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2013, came in at 21 AF — 55% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 42 8th lowest of 12 · 110% of median 107 0.2
1995 30 3rd lowest of 12 · 79% of median 77 0.2
1996 49 10th lowest of 12 · 129% of median 125 0.2
1997 121 12th lowest of 12 · 318% of median 304 0.2
1998 44 9th lowest of 12 · 116% of median 123 0.2
1999 31 4th lowest of 12 · 82% of median 78 0.2
2005 59 11th lowest of 12 · 155% of median 150 0.2
2006 32 5th lowest of 12 · 84% of median 110 0.2
2008 40 7th lowest of 12 · 105% of median 82 0.2
2009 36 6th lowest of 12 · 95% of median 91 0.2
2010 21 1st lowest of 12 · 55% of median 54 0.2
2013 21 1st lowest of 12 · 55% of median 22 0.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1323 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 32% of the irrigation seasons in 1994-2013 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.