← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ILES SPRING AND PL NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 7201439 · 4 · PLATEAU CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1915-04-01403rd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: R A PITTS SEEPAGE DITCH (1915-04-01). Immediately behind: VANCE AND FORTSCH DITCH (1915-04-03).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30895.238311915-04-011941-07-25 0.360.0 CIRRDOM

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 32 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1997, came in at 17 AF — 54% of that, and 4th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 8 2nd lowest of 10 · 25% of median 212 0.0
1988 68 7th lowest of 10 · 216% of median 305 0.2
1989 38 6th lowest of 10 · 121% of median 215 0.2
1990 25 5th lowest of 10 · 79% of median 365 0.1
1991 9 3rd lowest of 10 · 29% of median 365 0.0
1992 83 8th lowest of 10 · 264% of median 366 0.2
1993 83 8th lowest of 10 · 264% of median 304 0.2
1995 1 1st lowest of 10 · 3% of median 61 0.0
1996 247 10th lowest of 10 · 784% of median 366 0.7
1997 17 4th lowest of 10 · 54% of median 304 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.