← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MADDEN DOMESTIC P-L

Structure dossier · WDID 7300510 · 4 · MAIDEN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1933-09-0147th most senior of the 221 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DUVALL RES. NO. 1 (1931-07-15). Immediately behind: MADDEN TROUT POND NO 2 (1933-09-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30895.305591933-09-011941-07-25 0.0020.0 CDOM 56

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 5 AF — 83% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 306 0.0
2012 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 306 0.0
2013 8 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 178 0.0
2014 4 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median 155 0.0
2015 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 276 0.0
2016 8 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 298 0.0
2017 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 228 0.0
2018 4 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median 217 0.0
2019 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 258 0.0
2020 4 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median 193 0.0
2021 5 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 274 0.0
2022 4 1st lowest of 15 · 67% of median 365 0.0
2023 5 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 332 0.0
2024 6 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 242 0.0
2025 5 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 122 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3811 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2010-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.