← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MCMULLEN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7700558 · 1 · OIL WELL CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1902-11-1730th most senior of the 187 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BOND HOUSE DITCH (1896-05-31). Immediately behind: SPRING CREEK DITCH (1911-05-25).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19313.01902-11-171912-11-13 2.00.0 CIRR #162
41016.295841930-12-311968-12-19 6.00.0 CIRRDOMSTK 68-50

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 247 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 42 AF — 17% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 558 14th lowest of 15 · 226% of median 197 4.9
2012 421 13th lowest of 15 · 170% of median 146 4.2
2013 208 7th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 127 2.8
2014 150 4th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 182 0.8
2015 262 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 215 1.5
2016 280 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 159 1.9
2017 201 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 129 1.6
2018 91 3rd lowest of 15 · 37% of median 112 0.8
2019 247 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 98 3.6
2020 7 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 25 0.2
2021 388 12th lowest of 15 · 157% of median 113 2.8
2022 743 15th lowest of 15 · 301% of median 155 5.8
2023 206 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 50 3.4
2024 347 11th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 45 7.0
2025 42 2nd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 68 0.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.