← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PABLO ORTIZ DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7700571 · 1 · NAVAJO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:31 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1914-06-0136th most senior of the 187 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KLONDIKE DITCH (1890-06-01). Immediately behind: SPRING GULCH DITCH (1914-12-31).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
28645.235271914-06-011962-04-19 1.50.0 CIRR #266
44254.01971-03-011971-12-31 1.50.0 CIRR
44699.01972-05-191972-12-31 1.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 273 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 17 AF — 6% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 20 3rd lowest of 15 · 7% of median 66 0.2
2007 174 7th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 14 206 1.1
2008 273 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 42 4.8
2009 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2010 20 3rd lowest of 15 · 7% of median 55 0.2
2011 45 6th lowest of 15 · 16% of median 74 0.5
2012 29 5th lowest of 15 · 11% of median 45 0.6
2018 1,643 15th lowest of 15 · 602% of median 178 8.9
2019 735 13th lowest of 15 · 269% of median 77 7.9
2020 899 14th lowest of 15 · 329% of median 188 6.9
2021 556 12th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 153 3.7
2022 282 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 89 2.9
2023 545 10th lowest of 15 · 200% of median 71 6.3
2024 548 11th lowest of 15 · 201% of median 99 5.5
2025 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 47 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.