← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WEST RANCH CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7700592 · 1 · NAVAJO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1916-06-2340th most senior of the 187 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PETERSON CREEK DITCH (1916-06-21). Immediately behind: SHEEP CREEK DITCH (1922-12-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
28645.24281916-06-231962-04-19 1.00.0 CIRR 68-253
42646.01966-10-051968-12-19 10.00.0 CIRRINDRECFIRDOMSTK #274, 68-2

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 405 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,175 AF — 290% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 231 5th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 76 5.1
2012 104 1st lowest of 15 · 26% of median 62 2.4
2013 753 12th lowest of 15 · 186% of median 169 5.0
2014 211 4th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 79 3.5
2015 587 10th lowest of 15 · 145% of median 99 4.3
2016 193 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median 43 3.5
2017 395 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 76 3.4
2018 659 11th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 87 8.7
2019 530 9th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 75 7.9
2020 105 2nd lowest of 15 · 26% of median 55 2.1
2021 311 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 128 3.8
2022 405 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 99 4.3
2023 802 13th lowest of 15 · 198% of median 168 6.0
2024 1,061 14th lowest of 15 · 262% of median 156 5.1
2025 1,175 15th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 142 7.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.