← Basin trends ·  All gages in this district

Fraser River at Upper Sta, near Winter Park

River gage · FRAUPPCO · USGS 09022000 · Division 5 · Water District 51 · Grand County

Live gage at DWR ↗ · USGS monitoring location ↗ · Download daily record (CSV)

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR station ↗ Source Independent agency measurement · verify at USGS ↗ Source Our computation, no independent reference · computed here from the screened record

Two different numbers, deliberately: Flowing now is raw 15-minute telemetry, provisional and unreviewed. Latest cached reading is the end of the verified daily record. They are never merged, and the verified series is the one the trend is computed on.

Extended record — reconstructed, not measured

This gage's own record starts in 1968. A retired gage nearby, WILLIAMS FORK NEAR LEAL, CO., ran earlier and overlapped it, so its measurements can be translated onto this gage's scale to extend the picture back roughly 35.0 years. The result before 1968 is a reconstruction. It is not what this gage measured, because this gage did not exist.

Donor gage WILLIAMS FORK NEAR LEAL, CO., 20.4 km away
Overlap used to fit 17,200 days, 1968-10-01 to 2026-09-30
Agreement (held out) r² 0.905
Typical error (held out) 21.8%, bias 0.9%
Grade weak
How this was built, and what it cannot tell you
  • The two gages had to overlap. Without shared days there is nothing to measure the relationship against, and no extension is offered at all — that rule rejected the overwhelming majority of candidate pairs.
  • The relationship is fitted in log space, because the ratio between two gages changes with flow. On Clear Creek the downstream gage reads 95% of the upstream one at low flow but 88% at high flow, because ditches in between take more when there is more to take. A single scale factor would get both ends wrong.
  • It is scored out of sample: fitted on half the overlap, tested on the other half. The numbers above are from the half it never saw.
  • Reconstruction never replaces a real observation. Every day in the series is labelled measured or reconstructed, and the overlap itself stays measured.
  • The trends published on this site still use the measured record only. This extension is offered for reading the longer shape, not as an input to the statistics.
  • DWR's published record is the authority. A reconstruction is an estimate of what this location would have read, not a measurement of it.

What the longer record says

Record usedYearsTrendpChange / decade
Measured only (what the site publishes) 47 1969–2026 decreasing 0.03037 -0.5 cfs
WILLEACO alone (measured, no reconstruction) 93 1934–2026 no trend 0.84996 -0.196 cfs
Extended (with reconstruction) 82 1934–2026 no trend 0.59141 -0.062 cfs

The longer record reaches a different conclusion, and the reconstruction's bias does not explain it: a 0.9% bias would tend to manufacture a decreasing trend, which is not what appears. The likeliest reading is statistical power — 47 years cannot detect what 82 can.

This pairing is graded weak, so its extended trend is shown for interest only and should not be used as a result. Extending changes the conclusion for roughly half the gages that have a reconstruction — which is why both rows are here and neither replaces the other. Every trend published elsewhere on this site uses the measured record only.

The record

Period of record
1968-10-01 → 2026-09-30
Daily values
17,207
Flowing now
3.07 cfs 2026-10-13 17:15, 1.9 h ago
Latest cached reading
3.2 cfs (2026-09-30)
Trend — measured record
no trend, -0.35 cfs/decade (-2.5% of median)
over 47 measured years. The 82-year extended record says no trend — both, and why they differ.

Readings come from the weekly-refreshed cache, never fetched live — the date beside the value says exactly how fresh it is. The live gage is one click up.

The water itself

USGS keeps a sensor here. Latest readings, with the last 30 days of daily means beside each. Provisional: not yet reviewed by USGS, and revised when it is.

Water temperature
6.6 °C · provisional
2026-10-13 23:15
30 d, 4.8–8.1
Specific conductance
142 µS/cm · provisional
2026-10-13 23:15
30 d, 141.0–145.0

Fetched 2026-10-14 00:23 UTC from USGS NWIS (site 09022000). The USGS page has the full sensor record; every Colorado sensor site is listed on one page.

Annual flow & trend

Chart: annual mean flow at Fraser River at Upper Sta, near Winter Park, water years 1968 to 2026. The measured record is no trend at -0.35 cubic feet per second per decade. Extended backwards with a reconstruction from WILLEACO, the 82-year record is no trend (p equals 0.59141). The two records are compared in the table above. The underlying yearly values are available as a CSV download linked at the top of this page.

Loading chart…

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (5.0).

Provenance

DWR station abbreviation FRAUPPCO; recorded station name “FRASER RIVER AT UPPER STA, NEAR WINTER PARK, CO.”; operated by USGS. Daily flows from the DWR HydroBase snapshot plus CDSS REST updates, refreshed on the weekly cycle. Trend statistics are Mann-Kendall (Hamed-Rao corrected) with Sen's slope in native cfs, the same numbers as the basin Trends tab.