← Basin trends ·  All gages in this district

Rio Grande at Wagon Wheel Gap

River gage · RIOWAGCO · USGS 08217500 · Division 3 · Water District 20 · Mineral County

Live gage at DWR ↗ · USGS monitoring location ↗ · Download daily record (CSV)

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR station ↗ Source Independent agency measurement · verify at USGS ↗ Source Our computation, no independent reference · computed here from the screened record

Two different numbers, deliberately: Flowing now is raw 15-minute telemetry, provisional and unreviewed. Latest cached reading is the end of the verified daily record. They are never merged, and the verified series is the one the trend is computed on.

Extended record — reconstructed, not measured

This gage's own record starts in 1951. A retired gage nearby, RIO GRANDE AT WASON, BELOW CREEDE, CO., ran earlier and overlapped it, so its measurements can be translated onto this gage's scale to extend the picture back roughly 44.0 years. The result before 1951 is a reconstruction. It is not what this gage measured, because this gage did not exist.

Donor gage RIO GRANDE AT WASON, BELOW CREEDE, CO., 7.4 km away
Overlap used to fit 1,249 days, 1951-05-01 to 1954-09-30
Agreement (held out) r² 0.996
Typical error (held out) 2.9%, bias 0.1%
Grade strong
How this was built, and what it cannot tell you
  • The two gages had to overlap. Without shared days there is nothing to measure the relationship against, and no extension is offered at all — that rule rejected the overwhelming majority of candidate pairs.
  • The relationship is fitted in log space, because the ratio between two gages changes with flow. On Clear Creek the downstream gage reads 95% of the upstream one at low flow but 88% at high flow, because ditches in between take more when there is more to take. A single scale factor would get both ends wrong.
  • It is scored out of sample: fitted on half the overlap, tested on the other half. The numbers above are from the half it never saw.
  • Reconstruction never replaces a real observation. Every day in the series is labelled measured or reconstructed, and the overlap itself stays measured.
  • The trends published on this site still use the measured record only. This extension is offered for reading the longer shape, not as an input to the statistics.
  • DWR's published record is the authority. A reconstruction is an estimate of what this location would have read, not a measurement of it.

What the longer record says

Record usedYearsTrendpChange / decade
Measured only (what the site publishes) 74 1952–2026 no trend 0.80826 1.175 cfs
RIOWASCO alone (measured, no reconstruction) 47 1908–1954 decreasing 0.00422 -64.369 cfs
Extended (with reconstruction) 118 1908–2026 decreasing 0.003 -15.738 cfs

The strongest evidence needs no reconstruction at all. RIOWASCO shows decreasing across its own 47 measured years (1908–1954, p = 0.00422) — that is a measurement of this reach, not an estimate. The extended record mostly inherits it, which is why the long view differs from the 74-year modern one.

Treat this difference as suspect. The reconstruction runs 0.1% high against the held-out half of the overlap. A reconstruction that reads high lifts the early years up and can manufacture exactly the decreasing trend seen here. The longer record may be right, but this pairing cannot distinguish a real change from its own bias.

Extending changes the conclusion for roughly half the gages that have a reconstruction — which is why both rows are here and neither replaces the other. Every trend published elsewhere on this site uses the measured record only.

The record

Period of record
1951-05-01 → 2026-09-27
Daily values
27,379
Flowing now
1750.0 cfs 2026-10-14 21:15, 2.3 h ago
Latest cached reading
805.0 cfs (2026-09-27)
Trend — measured record
no trend, 4.05 cfs/decade (0.8% of median)
over 74 measured years. The 118-year extended record says decreasing — both, and why they differ.

Readings come from the weekly-refreshed cache, never fetched live — the date beside the value says exactly how fresh it is. The live gage is one click up.

Annual flow & trend

Chart: annual mean flow at Rio Grande at Wagon Wheel Gap, water years 1951 to 2026. The measured record is no trend at 4.05 cubic feet per second per decade. Extended backwards with a reconstruction from RIOWASCO, the 118-year record is decreasing (p equals 0.003). The two records are compared in the table above. The underlying yearly values are available as a CSV download linked at the top of this page.

Loading chart…

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (5.0).

Seasonal runoff outlook

NRCS calls it even odds that this gage carries at least 45 thousand acre-feetA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year. over 06-01 to 09-30 — 25% of a normal season; almost certainly at least 22, probably not more than 81. Issued 2026-06-01 — the season’s final; new forecasts begin in January.

90% chance of at least70% chance of at least50% chance of at least30% chance of at least10% chance of at leastNormal
22 kAF33 kAF45 kAF60 kAF81 kAF 182 kAF

The row is one season as a range of odds (exceedanceA forecast stated as odds of AT LEAST this much: the 90% exceedance value is a near-floor the river beats nine years in ten, the 10% value a near-ceiling it reaches one year in ten, and 50% is even odds -- as likely to come in above as below. values): the left end is a near-floor the river beats nine years in ten, the right a near-ceiling. How to read these numbers → Forecast by the NRCS National Water and Climate Center; shown beside the gage’s own record, which is what it is verified against on the report card.

Provenance

DWR station abbreviation RIOWAGCO; recorded station name “RIO GRANDE AT WAGON WHEEL GAP”; operated by DWR. Daily flows from the DWR HydroBase snapshot plus CDSS REST updates, refreshed on the weekly cycle. Trend statistics are Mann-Kendall (Hamed-Rao corrected) with Sen's slope in native cfs, the same numbers as the basin Trends tab.