Hydrohistorian
Town of Springfield
Serves Springfield.
Modelled boundary. EPA estimated this service area (Random Forest) rather than tracing a utility-supplied map; treat the edge as approximate. About 2 km².
Where the water comes from
| Facility | Kind | Water |
|---|---|---|
| WELL NO 1 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 3 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 9 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 10 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 11 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 12 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 13 | Well | Groundwater |
These are EPA's facility records, not DWR structures. Which decreed rights sit behind an intake is the next phase; nothing here is inferred.
DWR structures that name this system
Source Probable join · fetched 2026-09-09 · matched on DWR's recorded contact or an EPA intake name; verify on the dossier
No DWR structure on file records this system as its contact, and none of its EPA intakes matches a structure name in its districts. DWR records a contact on only a fraction of structures, and only for districts fetched from its live service, so this is absence of a record, not evidence of no rights.
Compliance record
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA ECHO ↗
Nothing open today, but 4 health-based violations appear on the federal record historically. The history is below.
EPA's own summary: violations in 3 of the last 12 quarters. In violation for, in EPA's words: 2456=Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).
What happened
All 4 violation records on file, grouped into the 3 distinct things EPA's codes describe. Dates are the compliance period the violation is filed against.
Rule: Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule.
Rule: Nitrate and nitrite.
Rule: Radionuclides -- radium, uranium and gross alpha.
Every violation record, as filed (4 of 4)
| Compliance period | What | About | Kind | Status | Measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-01 | Treatment Technique No Certif. Operator | DBP Stage 1 | health-based | returned to compliance (2023-03-02) | |
| 2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 | MCL, Average | Nitrate | health-based | returned to compliance (2021-03-18) | 27.3 MG/L (limit 10.0) |
| 2015-07-01 – 2015-09-30 | MCL, Average | Combined Uranium | health-based | returned to compliance (2016-06-08) | 41.0 UG/L (limit 30.0) |
| 2015-04-01 – 2015-06-30 | MCL, Average | Combined Uranium | health-based | returned to compliance (2016-06-08) | 32.0 UG/L (limit 30.0) |
What the regulator did about it
21 enforcement actions on this system's federal record. In Colorado the state is the primacy agency, so most actions are the state's; EPA acts directly on tribal systems and when it steps in.
| Date | Action | By |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | St Compliance achieved FTM HAA5 in 2023 RTC through timely 2024 dual sample collected 07/08/24 reported 07/26/24 (lfra 11/12/24); |
state |
| 2023-10-31 | St Public Notif received PN delivered 10/31/23 meets requirements, COD received on 11/03/23 (lfra 11/07/23) |
state |
| 2023-10-18 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2023-10-18 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2023-03-02 | St Compliance achieved all required documentation recvd TJ |
state |
| 2023-03-02 | St Public Notif received | state |
| 2023-02-10 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2023-02-10 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-07-25 | St Compliance achieved System RTCd with sample result. AS; |
state |
| 2022-07-21 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-07-21 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-07-21 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-07-21 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2021-03-18 | St Compliance achieved System RTCd with MP update changing this well to an emergency well. AS: |
state |
| 2021-03-18 | State No Longer Subject to Rule 5-14-2021 - System changed well to emergency well. AS: |
state |
| 2020-12-07 | St Public Notif received | state |
| 2020-12-03 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2020-12-03 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2019-08-09 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2019-08-06 | St Compliance achieved | state |
20 most recent of 21; the rest are on the ECHO report.
Lead and copper
The latest 90th-percentile lead result is 0.001 mg/L (sampling period ending 2025-12-31) against an action level of 0.015 mg/L, below it. 6 results on file.
The action level is not a health limit: it is the level at which the rule requires a system to act (corrosion control, public education, and in some cases replacing lead service lines). Lead mostly enters water from household plumbing, so a system-wide percentile does not tell you what comes out of one tap.
Violation, enforcement and lead/copper records are EPA SDWIS federal reporting, fetched monthly; the summary is EPA ECHO. Code names come from EPA's own REF_CODE_VALUE table. SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample results — nitrate, disinfection by-product and PFAS values are not in it, and a clean record here means nothing was reported as a violation, not that nothing was ever detected. For what was measured, ask the system for its Consumer Confidence Report.
PFAS and lithium: EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring, 2023–2025
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA UCMR occurrence data ↗
EPA did not sample this system under UCMR 5 (the rule covered every system serving more than 3,300 people and a drawn sample of smaller ones).
Common questions
Who provides drinking water in Springfield, Colorado?
The Town of Springfield is the public water system serving 1,378 people in Baca County, from groundwater. Its EPA public water system id is CO0105500.
Where does the Town of Springfield get its water?
The Town of Springfield reports groundwater as its primary source. EPA lists its source facilities as WELL NO 1, WELL NO 3, WELL NO 9, WELL NO 10.
Does the Town of Springfield have any drinking water violations?
EPA's compliance record shows no open health-based violations for the Town of Springfield at the last monthly fetch. Older and non-health-based entries, if any, are listed on this page.
Places this system serves
Census places its EPA service-area boundary substantially covers. Each page lists every system serving that place.
Every provider in Baca County.
The record
EPA SDWIS federal reporting as of 2026-09-08; the compliance record above is EPA's own, fetched monthly, and the ECHO report carries the rest. Report a problem →