Hydrohistorian
Town of Sugar City
Serves Sugar City.
Boundary traced from WSP. About 1 km².
Where the water comes from
| Facility | Kind | Water |
|---|---|---|
| WELL NO 1 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 2 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 3 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 4 | Well | Groundwater |
| WELL NO 5 | Well | Groundwater |
These are EPA's facility records, not DWR structures. Which decreed rights sit behind an intake is the next phase; nothing here is inferred.
DWR structures that name this system
Source Probable join · fetched 2026-09-09 · matched on DWR's recorded contact or an EPA intake name; verify on the dossier
No DWR structure on file records this system as its contact, and none of its EPA intakes matches a structure name in its districts. DWR records a contact on only a fraction of structures, and only for districts fetched from its live service, so this is absence of a record, not evidence of no rights.
Compliance record
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA ECHO ↗
No open violation and no health-based violation on EPA's federal record for this system at the last monthly fetch. That is a record of reported compliance, not a test result: SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample values.
EPA's own summary: violations in 3 of the last 12 quarters.
No health-based or open violation on the federal record for this system.
What the regulator did about it
20 enforcement actions on this system's federal record. In Colorado the state is the primacy agency, so most actions are the state's; EPA acts directly on tribal systems and when it steps in.
| Date | Action | By |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-21 | St Compliance achieved LCN and COD received 1/22/25. SOX applied. LP 1/22/25 |
state |
| 2025-01-15 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2025-01-15 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2024-10-11 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2024-09-06 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2024-09-04 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2024-03-04 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2024-02-29 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2024-01-17 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2024-01-17 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-02-09 | St Public Notif received PN received with COD. FCL 02/10/2022 |
state |
| 2022-02-02 | St Compliance achieved RTC SOX nitrate sample for 2021 turned in on 02/02/2022 FCL |
state |
| 2022-01-27 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-01-27 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2020-03-10 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2020-02-13 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2019-10-24 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2019-10-17 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2016-07-22 | St Compliance achieved Sox 2015 CCR violation with complete submitall of 2016 CCR. cp |
state |
| 2016-05-27 | St Compliance achieved Late 2015 CCR sox-d by submitting on time 2016 CCR. cp |
state |
Lead and copper
The latest 90th-percentile lead result is 0.0012 mg/L (sampling period ending 2025-12-31) against an action level of 0.015 mg/L, below it. 6 results on file.
The action level is not a health limit: it is the level at which the rule requires a system to act (corrosion control, public education, and in some cases replacing lead service lines). Lead mostly enters water from household plumbing, so a system-wide percentile does not tell you what comes out of one tap.
Violation, enforcement and lead/copper records are EPA SDWIS federal reporting, fetched monthly; the summary is EPA ECHO. Code names come from EPA's own REF_CODE_VALUE table. SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample results — nitrate, disinfection by-product and PFAS values are not in it, and a clean record here means nothing was reported as a violation, not that nothing was ever detected. For what was measured, ask the system for its Consumer Confidence Report.
PFAS and lithium: EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring, 2023–2025
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA UCMR occurrence data ↗
EPA did not sample this system under UCMR 5 (the rule covered every system serving more than 3,300 people and a drawn sample of smaller ones).
Common questions
Who provides drinking water in Sugar City, Colorado?
The Town of Sugar City is the public water system serving 240 people in Crowley County, from groundwater. Its EPA public water system id is CO0113900.
Where does the Town of Sugar City get its water?
The Town of Sugar City reports groundwater as its primary source. EPA lists its source facilities as WELL NO 1, WELL NO 2, WELL NO 3, WELL NO 4.
Does the Town of Sugar City have any drinking water violations?
EPA's compliance record shows no open health-based violations for the Town of Sugar City at the last monthly fetch. Older and non-health-based entries, if any, are listed on this page.
Places this system serves
Census places its EPA service-area boundary substantially covers. Each page lists every system serving that place.
Every provider in Crowley County.
The record
EPA SDWIS federal reporting as of 2026-09-08; the compliance record above is EPA's own, fetched monthly, and the ECHO report carries the rest. Report a problem →